How to Explain a Football Field Valuation in Interviews
IB interview guide to football field charts: what each methodology means, how to read the ranges, and how to defend a recommended offer band.
IB · 4 min read
The football field is the valuation summary slide: horizontal bars for DCF, trading comps, precedents, maybe LBO, each showing a value range. Interviews ask you to read it, not decorate it. Your job is to turn bars into a buyer-aware offer story that a managing director could defend in a committee.
The short answer
"A football field shows implied equity or enterprise value ranges from different methodologies. I read each bar as a different lens: intrinsic (DCF), public market minority (trading comps), control deals (precedents), and sometimes sponsor returns (LBO). I recommend an offer band where the bars overlap with a story, not a blind average of midpoints."
What each bar usually means
| Method | Lens |
|---|---|
| DCF | Intrinsic value under your assumptions |
| Trading comps | Public minority marks |
| Precedent transactions | Control deal marks |
| LBO / ability to pay | What a sponsor could pay at target returns |
| 52-week / analyst targets | Market context (secondary) |
Confirm whether the chart is equity value, enterprise value, or share price. Mixing axes is a classic fail. If one bar is EV and another is equity, ask before you narrate. Also check currency and diluted share count if they show per-share bars.
How to narrate a field
Axes
Confirm equity vs enterprise value and share price vs equity value.
Bars
State low/high drivers (multiples, WACC, growth).
Overlap
Where methods cluster.
Buyer type
Strategic vs sponsor: which bars matter most?
Recommend
Offer range plus which synergies or premiums are assumed.
Classic pattern and read
Trading comps: $80 to $95 DCF: $85 to $110 Precedents: $100 to $125
Read: public market marks lower; control deals higher. A strategic at $115 needs synergy and/or control justification versus a financial buyer limited by the LBO bar.
Comps
minority
Precedents
control
DCF
assumptions
Also explain the width of each bar. A tight comps range means peers clustered; a wide DCF range often means WACC and terminal value dominate. Wide is not always better: it can mean your model is assumption-driven. When precedents spike well above comps, narrate control premium, scarcity, and synergy budgets rather than calling comps "wrong."
LBO bar
An LBO range is not "fair value." It is max price for target IRR/MoIC at assumed leverage and exit. Useful for sell-side to know sponsor ability to pay. If the LBO bar tops out at $105 and precedents sit at $115 to $125, say clearly: sponsors need more leverage, lower entry, faster growth, or a lower return hurdle to clear, while strategics can pay for synergies.
How to defend a recommended band
Pick a band, then defend with buyer type:
- Financial buyer: lean on LBO ability-to-pay and comps as a floor/context
- Strategic: lean on precedents and synergy-adjusted DCF
- Auction: talk walk-away vs stretch, not a single point estimate
A good sentence: "We recommend $108 to $118 for a strategic with identifiable synergies; sponsors likely clear nearer $100 to $108 on the LBO screen."
Sensitivity language that sounds senior
When they ask why DCF is wide, answer with drivers, not apology: "High end assumes WACC near X and terminal growth Y; low end flips those. The midpoint is not sacred; it is one path." For comps: "We used N peers, EV/EBITDA of A to B, and applied to next-twelve-months EBITDA of C." That shows you built the bar, not memorized a picture. If they challenge a peer set, defend inclusion and exclusion rules in one breath: size, growth, margin, geography, business mix.
Mistakes
- Averaging all midpoints into "the" value
- Mixing equity and enterprise on one axis
- Ignoring that DCF range is mostly your WACC/TV choices
- Treating analyst price targets as a methodology peer to DCF
- Forgetting control premium when precedents sit above trading comps
- Recommending a price with no buyer-type story
What interviewers listen for
They want calm hierarchy: axes first, methods second, recommendation third. They also listen for humility on DCF: you own the assumptions. If the bars disagree, do not invent a fake consensus. Explain the disagreement, then pick a band that matches the live process (strategic bake-off, sponsor process, or dual-track).
30-second verbal
"The football field summarizes valuation ranges by method. I use comps for market context, precedents for control, DCF for intrinsic sensitivity, and LBO for sponsor constraints. My offer sits in the overlap that matches buyer type and synergy assumptions, not an average of midpoints."
Related
Football Field Valuation for deeper construction notes, plus Control Premium and Comps vs Precedents. For intrinsic work, pair with Walk Through a DCF.
"The average says $100 so we bid $100."
"Precedents support $110 to $120 for a strategic with synergies; sponsors max out nearer $105 on the LBO bar."
Practice on SheetRank
Apply what you learned with drills, guided Academy builds, and live deal underwriting.